Skip to main content
Search for Indicators

Healthy People 2030 Progress Tracker

Healthy People 2030 is a comprehensive set of key disease prevention and health promotion objectives for the United States. The health objectives and targets allow communities to assess their health status and build an agenda for community health improvement. 

While Healthy People objectives are intended for the country, this tracker can be used to monitor Hawai‘i's progress towards national targets. It includes national and state data for over 100 objectives including most of the Leading Health Indicators, listed as HP 2030 LHI. Click on an indicator and hover over the HP 2030 Target or HP 2030 LHI icon to learn more about the objective and how it is tracked in Hawai‘i. We added over 25 new indicators in September 2023 and will continue to add indicators as data becomes available. 

Since disparities exist even when the state, as a whole, has met the Healthy People target, we encourage you to click on the subcategory buttons, where available, to see the data by different demographic variables to examine at-risk populations. Click here to see the HP2030 Tracker webinar.

Indicator Gauge Icon Legend

Legend Colors

Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.

Compared to Distribution

an indicator guage with the arrow in the green the value is in the best half of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the yellow the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.

an indicator guage with the arrow in the red the value is in the worst quarter of communities.

Compared to Target

green circle with white tick inside it meets target; red circle with white cross inside it does not meet target.

Compared to a Single Value

green diamond with downward arrow inside it lower than the comparison value; red diamond with downward arrow inside it higher than the comparison value; blue diamond with downward arrow inside it not statistically different from comparison value.

Trend

green square outline with upward trending arrow inside it green square outline with downward trending arrow inside it non-significant change over time; green square with upward trending arrow inside it green square with downward trending arrow inside it significant change over time; blue square with equals sign no change over time.

Compared to Prior Value

green triangle with upward trending arrow inside it higher than the previous measurement period; green triangle with downward trending arrow inside it lower than the previous measurement period; blue equals sign no statistically different change  from previous measurement period.

More information about the gauges and icons

State: Hawaii

Access to Health Services

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Access to Health Services

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Persons with Health Insurance

Current Value:
95.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (92.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(92.4%)
<div> <div>AHS-01: Increase the proportion of people with health insurance <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the US Census Bureau- Small Area Health Insurance Estimates.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Pregnant Women with Dental Insurance

Current Value:
81.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (75.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(75.0%)
<div><span>AHS-02: Increase the proportion of people with dental insurance </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring Survey.</span></div>

State: Hawaii

Adolescent Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Adolescent Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year

70.2%
(2017)
Compared to:
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.6%)
<div><span>AH-01:  Increase the proportion of adolescents who had a preventive health care visit in the past year<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Children's Health.  The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.  It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator 'Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year' reports for those in grades 9-12.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year

Current Value:
73.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.6%)
<div><span>AH-01:  Increase the proportion of adolescents who had a preventive health care visit in the past year<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Children's Health.  The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source.  It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator 'Young Teens Who Had a Physical in the Past Year' reports for those in grades 6-8.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adolescents Who Speak Privately with a HC Provider

63.4%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (55.6%), Hawaii has a value of 63.4% which is higher and better.
US Value
(55.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (43.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(43.3%)
<div><span>AH-02: Increase the proportion of adolescents who speak privately with a provider at the preventive medical visit<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To

Current Value:
74.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.9%)
<div><span>AH-03:  Increase the proportion of adolescents who have an adult they can talk to about serious problems<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17.  The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator 'Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To' reports for those in grades 9-12.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To

Current Value:
73.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (82.9%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(82.9%)
<div><span>AH-03: Increase the proportion of adolescents who have an adult they can talk to about serious problems<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator 'Young Teens with an Adult They Can Talk To' reports for those in grades 6-8.</span></div>

State: Hawaii 4th Grade Reading Skills

Current Value:

State: Hawaii 4th Grade Reading Skills

35.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (32.1%), Hawaii has a value of 35.2% which is higher and better.
US Value
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (41.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(41.5%)
<div><span>AH-05: Increase the proportion of 4th-graders with reading skills at or above the proficient level <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii

Arthritis

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Arthritis

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults with Activity Limitations due to Arthritis

35.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (41.4%), Hawaii has a value of 35.5% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(41.4%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (38.7%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(38.7%)
<div><span>A-02:  Reduce the proportion of adults with arthritis whose arthritis limits their activities<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults with Work Limitations due to Arthritis

Current Value:
27.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (29.9%), Hawaii has a value of 27.9% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(29.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (34.7%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(34.7%)
<div><span>A-03:  Reduce the proportion of adults with arthritis whose arthritis limits their work<br /> <br />The national indicator is limited to adults aged 18-64.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii

Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Cancer

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Cancer Death Rate

118.2
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (146.4), Hawaii has a value of 118.2 which is lower and better.
US Value
(146.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (122.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(122.7)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-1:  </span></span><span>Reduce the overall cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Lung Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Lung Cancer Death Rate

21.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (31.7), Hawaii has a value of 21.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.7 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-02:  </span></span><span>Reduce the lung cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Lung Cancer Screening

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Lung Cancer Screening

7.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (9.7%), Hawaii has a value of 7.8% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(9.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (7.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(7.5%)
<div><span>C-03: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for lung cancer </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in differently as adults 55 to 80 years with a 30 pack-year smoking history who are current smokers or who quit in the last 15 years. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Breast Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Breast Cancer Death Rate

18.1
Deaths per 100,000 females
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (19.4), Hawaii has a value of 18.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (15.3), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(15.3)
<div> <div>C-04: Reduce the female breast cancer death rate</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

State: Hawaii Breast Cancer Screening

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Breast Cancer Screening

78.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (76.3%), Hawaii has a value of 78.5% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(76.3%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.5%)
<div> <div>C-05: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for breast cancer</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Colorectal Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
12.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.4), Hawaii has a value of 12.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.9), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.9)
<div> <div>C-06: Reduce the colorectal cancer death rate</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

State: Hawaii Colorectal Cancer Screening

Current Value:
75.6%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (69.6%), Hawaii has a value of 75.6% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(69.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (74.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(74.4%)
<div> <div>C-07: Increase the proportion of adults who get screened for colorectal cancer <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Prostate Cancer Death Rate

Current Value:
15.9
Deaths per 100,000 males
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (19.0), Hawaii has a value of 15.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(19.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.9), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.9)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>C-08:  </span></span><span>Reduce the prostate cancer death rate</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Cervical Cancer Screening

Current Value:
80.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (84.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(84.3%)
<div> <div>C-09: Increase the proportion of females who get screened for cervical cancer.<br /> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Five-Year Cancer Survivorship

Current Value:
64.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (66.2%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(66.2%)
<div><span>C-11: Increase the proportion of cancer survivors who are living 5 years or longer after diagnosis </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program (SEER). The data source for the state is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii

Chronic Kidney Disease

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Chronic Kidney Disease

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults with Kidney Disease

Current Value:
3.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (3.5%), Hawaii has a value of 3.4% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(3.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (12.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(12.8%)
<div> <div>CKD-01: Reduce the proportion of adults with chronic kidney disease.</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined differently as it is based on age-adjusted laboratory values. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Adults with CKD Who Have High Blood Pressure

Current Value:
68.3%
(2019, 2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (42.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(42.8%)
<div><span>CKD-06: Reduce the proportion of adults with chronic kidney disease who have elevated blood pressure<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source. </span></div>

State: Hawaii

Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Diabetes

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults with New Cases of Diabetes

Current Value:
7.4
New cases per 1,000 population
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (8.5), Hawaii has a value of 7.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(8.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (4.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(4.8)
<div><span>D-01:  Reduce the number of diabetes cases diagnosed yearly <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes adults aged 18-84.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained.  The state data source is the US Diabetes Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults with Diabetes and A1c Value Greater than 9

35.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (29.8%), Hawaii has a value of 35.7% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(29.8% in 2015)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (11.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(11.6%)
<div>D-03: Reduce the proportion of adults with diabetes who have an A1c value above 9%.</div> <div> </div> <div><span>The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii.  The state data source is the Uniform Data System from Federally Qualified Health Centers which is collected comparably to the national data source among people who receive medical care at FQHCs.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Hospitalization for Diabetes among Adults 65+

Current Value:
282.1
Hospitalizations per 100,000 population 65+ yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (264), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(264)
<div><span>OA-05: Reduce the rate of hospital admissions for diabetes among older adults<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indictor is the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. The state data source is Laulima, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii

Educational & Community-Based Programs

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Educational & Community-Based Programs

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education

9.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.

State: Hawaii Teens Who Attend Daily Physical Education

Current Value:
7.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (19.0%), Hawaii has a value of 7.2% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(19.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (39.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(39.0%)
<div><span>ECBP-01: Increase the proportion of adolescents who participate in daily school physical education<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii

Environmental Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Environmental Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Workers Commuting by Public Transportation

Current Value:
4.3%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Hawaii has a value of 4.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.3%)
<div> <div>EH-02: Increase trips to work made by mass transit</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii

Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Family Planning

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Pregnancies that Are Intended

Current Value:
56.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (62.5%), Hawaii has a value of 56.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(62.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.5%)
<div><span>FP-01: Reduce the proportion of unintended pregnancies<br /><br />The national indicator definition is limited to women aged 15-44 and uses live births as well as abortions and fetal losses for the denominator. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Pregnancies Among Females Aged 15-19 Years

Current Value:
16.7
Pregnancies per 1,000 females aged 15-19
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (31.0), Hawaii has a value of 16.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(31.0 in 2017)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4)
<div><span>FP-03:  Reduce pregnancies in adolescents<br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Women at Risk for Unintended Pregnancies Who Use Birth Control

50.7%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (65.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(65.1%)
<div><span>FP-10: Increase the proportion of women at risk for unintended pregnancy who use effective birth control<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator only includes most effective or moderately effective methods of contraception and is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Teen Girls at Risk for Unintended Pregnancies Who Use Birth Control

60.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (84.8%), Hawaii has a value of 60.3% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(84.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.8%)
<div><span>FP-05: Increase the proportion of adolescent females at risk for unintended pregnancy who use effective birth control<br /><br />The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey of Family Growth, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey of high school students, which is comparable to the national data source. </span></div>

State: Hawaii

Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Heart Disease & Stroke

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Coronary Heart Disease Death Rate

Current Value:
66.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (92.8), Hawaii has a value of 66.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(92.8 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (71.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(71.1)
<div><span>HDS-02: Reduce coronary heart disease deaths<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Stroke Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Stroke Death Rate

38.6
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (41.1), Hawaii has a value of 38.6 which is lower and better.
US Value
(41.1 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.4)
<div><span>HDS-03: Reduce stroke deaths   </span></div> <div><span></span></div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults with High Blood Pressure

Current Value:
29.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (11.1%), Hawaii has a value of 29.8% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(11.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (42.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(42.6%)
<div>HDS-04: Reduce the proportion of adults with high blood pressure<br /> <br />The national indicator excludes pregnant women. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div>

State: Hawaii Adults with Hypertension with Controlled Blood Pressure

57.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (63.4%), Hawaii has a value of 57.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(63.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (18.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(18.9%)
<div><span>HDS-05: Increase control of high blood pressure in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaiʻi.  The state data source is the Uniform Data System from Federally Qualified Health Centers which is collected comparably to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii

Infectious Disease

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Infectious Disease

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Children Aged 2 Years with 1 Dose of MMR Vaccine

89.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (91.4%), Hawaii has a value of 89.6% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(91.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (90.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(90.8%)
<div><span>IID-03: Maintain the vaccination coverage level of 1 dose of the MMR vaccine in children by age 2 years<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state. </span></div>

State: Hawaii Children in Kindergarten with 2 Doses of MMR Vaccine

86.4%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (93.1%), Hawaii has a value of 86.4% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(93.1%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (95%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(95%)
<div><span>IID-04: Maintain the vaccination coverage level of 2 doses of the MMR vaccine for children in kindergarten<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state. </span></div>

State: Hawaii Children Aged 2 Years with 4 Doses of DTaP Vaccine

80.5%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (80.7%), Hawaii has a value of 80.5% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(80.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (90%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(90%)
<div><span>IID-06: Increase the coverage level of 4 doses of the DTaP vaccine in children by age 2 years<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adolescents 13-15 with HPV Vaccines

Current Value:
69.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (58.6%), Hawaii has a value of 69.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(58.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (80.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(80.0%)
<div><span>IID-08: Increase the proportion of adolescents who get recommended doses of the HPV vaccine<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Persons Who Got the Flu Vaccine

Current Value:
51.4%
(2022-2023)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (70.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(70.0%)
<div> <div>IID-09: Increase the proportion of people who get the flu vaccine every year <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national objective includes all persons 6 months and older. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, which does not provide state-level data for Hawaiʻi. The state data sources are the National Immunization Survey for children 6 months to 17 years and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults 18 years and older, which are comparable to the national source. </div> </div>

State: Hawaii Adult Influenza Vaccination Rate

Current Value:
47.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (70.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(70.0%)
<div> <div>IID-09: Increase the proportion of people who get the flu vaccine every year <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div> </div> <div>The national objective includes all persons 6 months and older. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, which does not provide state-level data for Hawaiʻi. The state data sources are the National Immunization Survey for children 6 months to 17 years and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults 18 years and older, which are comparable to the national source. </div> </div>

State: Hawaii Acute Hepatitis B Incidence Rate

Current Value:
0.0
Cases per 100,000 population
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (0.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(0.1)
<div>IID-11: Reduce the rate of acute hepatitis B</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

State: Hawaii Hepatitis B-Related Death Rate

Current Value:
1.1
Per 100,000 People
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (0.4), Hawaii has a value of 1.1 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(0.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (0.16), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(0.16)
<div><span>IID-15: Reduce the rate of deaths with hepatitis B as a cause<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Hepatitis C-Related Death Rate

Current Value:
2.3
Per 100,000 People
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.2), Hawaii has a value of 2.3 which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.2 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (1.44), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(1.44)
<div><span>IID-16: Reduce the rate of deaths with hepatitis C as a cause<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Tuberculosis Incidence Rate

Current Value:
6.9
Cases per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (2.5), Hawaii has a value of 6.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(2.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value. The source for the national value is Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (1.4), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(1.4)

State: Hawaii

Injury & Violence Prevention

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Injury & Violence Prevention

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Injury Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Injury Death Rate

57.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (89.0), Hawaii has a value of 57.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(89.0 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (63.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(63.1)
<div>IVP-01: Reduce fatal injuries</div> <div><span> </span></div> <div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

State: Hawaii Motor Vehicle Collision Death Rate

Current Value:
5.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (13.8), Hawaii has a value of 5.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(13.8 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.1), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.1)
<div> <div>IVP-06: Reduce deaths from motor vehicle crashes</div> <div> </div> <p>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</p> </div>

State: Hawaii Homicide Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Homicide Death Rate

2.5
Per 100,000 population
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.8), Hawaii has a value of 2.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.8 in 2019-2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (5.5), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(5.5)
<div><span>IVP-09: Reduce homicides <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Drug and Opioid-Involved Overdose Death Rate

Current Value:
16.1
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (23.5), Hawaii has a value of 16.1 which is lower and better.
US Value
(23.5)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (13.1), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(13.1)
<div>IVP-20: Reduce overdose deaths involving opioids</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

State: Hawaii

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii LGB Teens Who Are Bullied

Current Value:
16.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (32.0%), Hawaii has a value of 16.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.0% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.1%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-05: Reduce bullying of lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii LGB Teens with Suicidal Thoughts

Current Value:
39.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (46.8%), Hawaii has a value of 39.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(46.8% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (52.1%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(52.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-06: Reduce suicidal thoughts in lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students<br /><br />The national indicator definition includes making a plan or attempting suicide in the past 12 months. The data source is the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii LGB Teens Who Use Illicit Drugs

Current Value:
38.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (23.2%), Hawaii has a value of 38.6% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(23.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (16.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(16.1%)
<div><span>LGBT-07: Reduce the proportion of lesbian, gay, or bisexual high school students who have used illicit drugs<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii

Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Mental Health & Mental Disorders

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Suicide Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Suicide Death Rate

15.9
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (14.2), Hawaii has a value of 15.9 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(14.2 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (12.8), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(12.8)
<div><span>MHMD-01: Reduce the suicide rate <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adolescents with Major Depressive Episodes Who Receive Treatment

30.1%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (43.9%), Hawaii has a value of 30.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(43.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (46.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(46.4%)
<div><span>MHMD-06: Increase the proportion of adolescents with depression who get treatment <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii

Maternal, Infant & Child Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Maternal, Infant & Child Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Infant Mortality Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Infant Mortality Rate

4.5
Deaths per 1,000 live births
(2019-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (5.6), Hawaii has a value of 4.5 which is lower and better.
US Value
(5.6 in 2022)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (5.0), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(5.0)
<div><span>MICH-02: Reduce the rate of infant deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR) </strong><br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Maternal Mortality Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Maternal Mortality Rate

16.9
Deaths per 100,000 live births
(2017-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (32.9), Hawaii has a value of 16.9 which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.9 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (15.7), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(15.7)
<div><span>MICH-04: Reduce maternal deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Preterm Births

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Preterm Births

9.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (10.5%), Hawaii has a value of 9.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.5% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (9.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(9.4%)
<div><span>MICH-07: Reduce preterm births<br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Infants Who Were Breastfed Exclusively Through 6 Months

26.6%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (25.4%), Hawaii has a value of 26.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(25.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (42.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(42.4%)
<div> <div> <div>MICH-15: Increase the proportion of infants who are breastfed exclusively through age 6 months</div> </div> <div> </div> <div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div> </div>

State: Hawaii Infants Who Were Breastfed at 12 Months

Current Value:
47.3%
(2020)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (37.6%), Hawaii has a value of 47.3% which is higher and better.
US Value
(37.6%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (54.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(54.1%)
<div>MICH-16: Increase the proportion of infants who are breastfed at 1 year</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

State: Hawaii Children 9-35 Months Who Receive a Developmental Screening

34.6%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (33.7%), Hawaii has a value of 34.6% which is higher and better.
US Value
(33.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (35.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(35.8%)
<div><span>MICH-17: Increase the proportion of children who receive a developmental screening<br /><br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii

Nutrition & Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Nutrition & Weight Status

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Households that Are Food Insecure

Current Value:
9.1%
(2020-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (11.2%), Hawaii has a value of 9.1% which is lower and better.
US Value
(11.2%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (6.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(6.0%)
<div><span>NWS-01: Reduce household food insecurity and hunger <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Obese

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Obese

25.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (33.6%), Hawaii has a value of 25.9% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36%)
<div> <div>NWS-03: Reduce the proportion of adults with obesity</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition is for adults age 20+ and this indicator is for adults 18+. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported but comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Children 10-17 Who Are Obese

Current Value:
17.1%
(2020-2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (17.0%), Hawaii has a value of 17.1% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(17.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (15.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(15.5%)
<div><span>NWS-04:  Reduce the proportion of children and adolescents with obesity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes children and adolescents aged 2-19. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaiʻi. The state data source is the National Survey of Children's Health, which is comparable to the national data source but is limited to children ages 10-17.</span></div>

State: Hawaii

Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Oral Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Children Who Visited a Dentist in the Past Year

85.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (80.4%), Hawaii has a value of 85.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(80.4%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (45.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year

Current Value:
78.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (45.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Teens Who Saw a Dentist in the Past Year

Current Value:
79.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (75.9%), Hawaii has a value of 79.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(75.9% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (45.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults Who Visited a Dentist

Current Value:
71.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (65.2%), Hawaii has a value of 71.9% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(65.2%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (45.0%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(45.0%)
<div><span>OH-08: Increase use of the oral health care system <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator includes persons of all ages. The data source for the national indicator is the Medical Expenditue Panel Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be estimated. The state data sources include the National Survey on Children's Health for children aged 1-17, the Youth Risk Behavior Survey for middle school (young teens) and high school students (teens), and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System for adults aged 18 and over.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Children with a Preventive Dental Care Visit

Current Value:
82.7%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (77.0%), Hawaii has a value of 82.7% which is higher and better.
US Value
(77.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (79.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(79.9%)
<div>OH-09: Increase the proportion of low-income youth who have a preventive dental visit.</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is limited to youth who reside in households with income less than 200 percent of the federal poverty level.  <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the same as for the state. To see the exact comparison view by percent of Federal Poverty Level subgroup 0-199%.</span></div> <div> </div> <div> </div>

State: Hawaii Children with Cavities or Tooth Decay

Current Value:
9.5%
(2021-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (12.3%), Hawaii has a value of 9.5% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.2%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.2%)
<div>OH-2: Reduce the proportion of children and adolescents with active and untreated tooth decay.</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator includes youth aged 3-19 years.  <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaii.  The state data source is the National Survey of Children's Health, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults 45+ with Total Tooth Loss

Current Value:
3.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.4%)
<div><span>OH-05: Reduce the proportion of adults aged 45 years and over who have lost all their teeth. <br /><br />The national indicator defined exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) which is based on a physical exam and from which data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data for this objective is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Population with Fluoridated Water

Current Value:
8.8%
(2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (73.0%), Hawaii has a value of 8.8% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(73.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (77.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(77.1%)
<div><span>OH-11: Increase the proportion of persons served by community systems with optimally fluoridated water systems.<br /><br />The national indicator is defined exactly the same way is based on the population covered by public or community water systems in the United States. The state indicator is taken from the same data source as the national indicator. </span></div>

State: Hawaii

Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Physical Activity

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Sedentary

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Sedentary

21.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (23.5%), Hawaii has a value of 21.3% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (21.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(21.8%)
<div> <div>PA-01: Reduce the proportion of adults who do no physical activity in their free time</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined differently as it is based on performing 10 minutes of physical activity. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

56.0%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (49.9%), Hawaii has a value of 56.0% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (52.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(52.9%)
<div><span>PA-02:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for substantial health benefits<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults Who Meet High Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

36.3%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (32.1%), Hawaii has a value of 36.3% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(32.1%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (33.9%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(33.9%)
<div><span>PA-03:  Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for extensive health benefits<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Muscle Strengthening Guidelines

37.9%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (35.7%), Hawaii has a value of 37.9% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(35.7%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (36.6%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(36.6%)
<div><span>PA-04: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough muscle-strengthening activity<br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults Who Meet Aerobic and Strengthening Activity Guidelines

24.8%
(2019)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (23.0%), Hawaii has a value of 24.8% which is higher and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(23.0%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (29.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(29.7%)
<div><span>PA-05: Increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic and muscle-strengthening activity <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Teens Who Meet Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines

23.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (23.9%), Hawaii has a value of 23.1% which is lower and worse.
US Value
(23.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (30.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(30.6%)
<div>PA-06: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough aerobic physical activity</div> <div> </div> <div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Teens Who Meet Muscle-Strengthening Guidelines

Current Value:
45.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (44.9%), Hawaii has a value of 45.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(44.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (56.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(56.1%)
<div>PA-07: Increase the proportion of adolescents who do enough muscle-strengthening activity</div> <div> </div> <div>The <span style="font-weight:400;">national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii

Respiratory Disease

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Respiratory Disease

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Asthma Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Asthma Death Rate

1.3
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (1.1), Hawaii has a value of 1.3 which is higher and worse.
US Value
(1.1 in 2020)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (0.89), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(0.89)
<div>RD-01: Reduce asthma deaths </div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div>

State: Hawaii ED Visits for Asthma among Children 0-4

Current Value:
54.2
Visits per 10,000 population < 5 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (64.3), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(64.3)
<div> <div><span>RD-02:  </span> <span> Reduce emergency department visits for children under 5 years with asthma</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data.  The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii ED Visits for Asthma: 5-64 yrs

Current Value:
35.6
Visits per 10,000 people 5-64 yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (40.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(40.2)
<div> <div><span>RD-03:  </span> <span> Reduce emergency department visits for people aged 5 years and over with asthma</span></div> <div><span> </span></div> <div><span>The </span>national indicator is defined for people aged 5 years and older.  Hawaii tracks 5-64 years and 65+ years separately. The data source for the national indicator is the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data.  The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii ED Visits for Asthma among Adults 65+

Current Value:
32.5
Visits per 10,000 population 65+ yrs
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (40.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(40.2)
<div> <div>RD-03: Reduce emergency department visits for people aged 5 years and over with asthma</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined for people ages 5 years and older. Hawaiʻi tracks 5-64 years and 65+ years separately. The data source for the national indicator is the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, which does not provide state-level data. The state data source is the Laulima Data Alliance, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii COPD Death Rate 45+ Yrs

Current Value:

State: Hawaii COPD Death Rate 45+ Yrs

48.0
Deaths per 100,000 population 45+ years
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (98.6), Hawaii has a value of 48.0 which is lower and better.
US Value
(98.6 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (107.2), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(107.2)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>RD-05:  </span></span><span>Reduce deaths from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among adults</span></div> <div> </div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div> </div>

State: Hawaii

Social Determinants of Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Social Determinants of Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Employed

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Are Employed

73.1%
(2017-2018)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (72.0%), Hawaii has a value of 73.1% which is higher and better.
US Value
(72.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (75.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(75.0%)
<div><span>SDOH-02: Increase employment in working-age people <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /><br />The national indicator definition includes persons aged 16-64. The data source is the same as for the state.</span></div>

State: Hawaii People Living Below Poverty Level

Current Value:
9.6%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (12.5%), Hawaii has a value of 9.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(12.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.0%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.0%)
<div>SDOH-01: Reduce the proportion of people living in poverty</div>

State: Hawaii Mortgaged Owners Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Housing

41.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (27.8%), Hawaii has a value of 41.3% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(27.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
<div> <div>SDOH-04:  Reduce the proportion of families that spend more than 30 percent of income on housing</div> <div> </div> <div>The data source for the national indicator is the American Housing Survey from which state-level data cannot be obtained. The state data source is the American Community Survey which is comparable to the national data source but the denominator is mortgaged owners rather than households. </div> </div>

State: Hawaii Renters Spending 30% or More of Household Income on Rent

55.8%
(2018-2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (49.9%), Hawaii has a value of 55.8% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(49.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (25.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(25.5%)
<div>SDOH-04:  Reduce the proportion of families that spend more than 30 percent of income on housing</div> <div> </div> <div>The data source for the national indicator is the American Housing Survey from which state-level data cannot be obtained. The state data source is the American Community Survey which is comparable to the national data source but the denominator is renter-occupied housing units rather than households. </div> <div> </div>

State: Hawaii

Sleep Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Sleep Health

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Get Insufficient Sleep

Current Value:
45.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (31.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(31.4%)
<div>SH-03: Increase the proportion of adults who get enough sleep</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined as adults who get an average of at least 7 hours of sleep. <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source, but is the inverse, people who get fewer than 7 hours of sleep on average. The HP 2030 target has been adjusted accordingly.</span></div> <div> </div>

State: Hawaii Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep

Current Value:
23.5%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (22.7%), Hawaii has a value of 23.5% which is higher and better.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.4%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>SH-04:  </span></span><span>Increase the proportion of high school students in grades who get enough sleep</span></div> <div> </div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div> </div>

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Get Sufficient Sleep

Current Value:
46.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (27.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(27.4%)
<div> <div><span class="bold"><span>SH-04:  </span></span><span>Increase the proportion of students in grades 9 through 12 who get sufficient sleep</span></div> <div> </div> <div><span>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state. There is no national middle school survey for students in grades 6-8; however, Hawaiʻi has additional data for this indicator. </span></div> </div>

State: Hawaii

Substance Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Substance Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Cirrhosis Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Cirrhosis Death Rate

7.4
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (14.5), Hawaii has a value of 7.4 which is lower and better.
US Value
(14.5 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.9), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.9)
<div> <div>SU-02: Reduce cirrhosis deaths</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Drug Overdose Death Rate

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Drug Overdose Death Rate

16.7
Deaths per 100,000 population
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (32.4), Hawaii has a value of 16.7 which is lower and better.
US Value
(32.4 in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (20.7), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(20.7)
<div> <div>SU-03: Reduce drug overdose deaths <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div> <div><strong></strong></div> <div>The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Use Alcohol

Current Value:
6.4%
(2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.3%)
<div><span>SU-04: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who drank alcohol in the past month<br /><br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use Alcohol' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>

State: Hawaii Teens Who Use Alcohol

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Teens Who Use Alcohol

16.6%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (22.7%), Hawaii has a value of 16.6% which is lower and better.
US Value
(22.7%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(6.3%)
<div><span>SU-04: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who drank alcohol in the past month<br /><br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use Alcohol' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Binge Drink

Current Value:
2.1%
(2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator includes adolescents ages 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. However, binge drinking is defined as 4 or more drinks on one occasional for girls and 5 or more drinks for boys in the NSDUH, but only as 5 or more drinks for boys or girls in this indicator for middle school students grades 6-8. </div>

State: Hawaii Teens Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Teens Who Binge Drink

8.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (10.5%), Hawaii has a value of 8.3% which is lower and better.
US Value
(10.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (8.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(8.4%)
<div><span>SU-09: Reduce the proportion of people under 21 years who engaged in binge drinking in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-20. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. Binge drinking is defined the same in the YRBS and NSDUH for high school students in grades 9-12. </span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults Who Binge Drink

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Binge Drink

18.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (16.9%), Hawaii has a value of 18.2% which is higher and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(16.9%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (25.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(25.4%)
<div>SU-10: Reduce the proportion of people aged 21 years and over who engaged in binge drinking in the past month <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator includes persons aged 21 and over.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source but includes adults 18 years and older.</div>

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Use Marijuana

Current Value:
2.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is increasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.8%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.8%)
<div><span>SU-06: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who used marijuana in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source and provides more information for the state. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use Marijuana' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>

State: Hawaii Teens Who Use Marijuana

Current Value:

State: Hawaii Teens Who Use Marijuana

12.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (15.8%), Hawaii has a value of 12.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(15.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (5.8%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(5.8%)
<div><span>SU-06: Reduce the proportion of adolescents who used marijuana in the past month<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adolescents aged 12-17. The national data source is the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source and provides more information for the state. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use Marijuana' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>

State: Hawaii Proportion of Motor Vehicle Crash Deaths Involving a Drunk Driver

31.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (31.8%), Hawaii has a value of 31.9% which is higher and worse.
US Value
(31.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (28.3%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(28.3%)
<div> <div>SU-11: Reduce the proportion of motor vehicle crash deaths that involve a drunk driver</div> <div> </div> <div><span style="font-weight:400;">The national indicator definition and data source are the same as for the state.</span></div> </div>

State: Hawaii

Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii

Tobacco Use

Value
Compared to:

State: Hawaii Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
10.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (13.5%), Hawaii has a value of 10.0% which is lower and better.
Median Value for States and Territories
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 LHI (6.1%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 LHI
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong><br /> <br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national source.</div>

State: Hawaii Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
3.0%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (3.8%), Hawaii has a value of 3.0% which is lower and better.
US Value
(3.8%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes

Current Value:
1.9%
(2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (3.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(3.4%)
<div><span>TU-06: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Smoke Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>

State: Hawaii Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
14.8%
(2021)
Compared to:
Compared to the US Value (18.0%), Hawaii has a value of 14.8% which is lower and better.
US Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Over time, the Hawaii value is staying the same.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 9-12, while the indicator ‘Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 6-8. </span></div>

State: Hawaii Young Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes

Current Value:
6.7%
(2021)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.5%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.5%)
<div><span>TU-05: Reduce current e-cigarettes use in adolescents<br /><br />The national indicator is defined in exactly the same way. The data source for the national indicator is the National Youth Tobacco Survey. The state data source is the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is comparable to the national data source. It is divided into two groups: grades 6-8 and grades 9-12. This indicator reports data for students in grades 6-8, while the indicator ‘Teens Who Use E-Cigarettes' reports for those in grades 9-12. </span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults Who Attempted to Quit Smoking Cigarettes

45.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
Compared to the Median Value for States and Territories (51.8%), Hawaii has a value of 45.8% which is lower and worse.
Median Value for States and Territories
(51.8% in 2011)
The regional value is compared to the median value for states and territories.
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (65.7%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(65.7%)
<div><span>TU-11: Increase past-year attempts to quit smoking in adults<br /> <br />The national indicator includes adults who quit in the past year.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaii cannot be obtained.  The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div>

State: Hawaii Adults Who Recently Quit Smoking Cigarettes

Current Value:
9.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (10.6%), the target has not been met.
HP 2030 Target
(10.6%)
<div>TU-14: Increase successful quit attempts in adults who smoke</div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined exactly the same way. <span style="font-weight:400;">The data source for the national indicator is the National Health Interview Survey, from which state-level data for Hawaiʻi cannot be obtained. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is comparable to the national data source.</span></div> <div> </div>

State: Hawaii Women Who Quit Smoking Cigarettes During Pregnancy

71.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, not significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (24.4%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(24.4%)
<div> <div>TU-15: Increase successful quit attempts in pregnant women who smoke cigarettes </div> <div> </div> <div>The national indicator is defined as the percent of females who reported smoking cigarettes <span>at any time during the first and/or second trimester and reported not smoking during the third trimester of their pregnancy</span>.  The data source for the national indicator is the National Vital Statistics System.  The state data source is the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, which is comparable to the national data source.</div> </div>

State: Hawaii Adults Exposed to Secondhand Smoke

Current Value:
8.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
Over time, the Hawaii value is decreasing, significantly.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Compared to the HP 2030 Target (17.3%), the target has  been met.
HP 2030 Target
(17.3%)
<div>TU-19: Reduce the proportion of people who donʻt smoke but are exposed to secondhand smoke</div> <div><span style="font-weight:400;"><span></span></span></div> <div><span style="font-weight:400;"><span>The national indicator is defined differently as the proportion of children, nonsmoking adolescents, and nonsmoking adults aged 3 years and over who had a serum cotinine level greater than or equal to 0.05 ng/mL and less than or equal to 10 ng/ml. </span>The data source for the national indicator is the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, which is not conducted in Hawaiʻi. The state data source is the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, which is self-reported data and only includes adults ages 18+.</span></div>